Students who fail should pay for college

Nowadays most governments provide their populations with free education colleges and universities to get good knowledge’s and reach high level of educations. That will help the people and their countries for more improvements. In this argument essay I will discuss whether failing students should pay for college or no.

There are some people agree that students who fail should pay for college for several reasons. The first main reason is that they are wasting valuable money of the government budget, especially young students who finish the high school level and going to attend colleges and universities to continue their education. These careless students should pay to complete their education on their own responsibility.
On other hand, there are several reasons why failing students should not pay. The first major reason is that the student’s family might not have enough money. Some students who fail have family financial or other difficulties. This might be the reason why they could not focus their efforts in their study. Another important reason is that students who fail a certain course have to be given a chance to improve themselves. This might encourage them to study harder in order graduate.

In conclusion, in my opinion I think that the government should put a limit of years for the failing students to give them chance to prove them and to realize the real meaning of study.

Drugs traffickers

Drug trafficking has become an increasingly growing problem in the world today as more people are involved in drugs. People think it is a fast and easy way to get money, not knowing all the risks. There are many risks when dealing drugs and the risks are all different depending on what kind of drug it is and how addictive it is.
Drugs are fast spreading through the high school systems. There are always a few kids in every school that drop out and start to deal drugs .There are many people who support the idea that drug traffickers should be executed because of many reasons which are helping the community and humans to live and feel freedom. Firstly, an important reason is that drugs kill so a strong deterrent is needed and prison is not enough . The public expects a severe penalty and these criminals are too dangerous to allow live.
On the other hand, others think that drugs traffickers should not have such strong punishment. First of all that drugs traffickers may do not do this kind of anti-social activity again so the government should not punish them in this way. Another reason is that there are much more serious crimes that deserve severe punishment such as terrorism, murder, rape or child abuse. Drugs are fashionable and all sections of society use them, even President Obama and Clinton have admitted drug use. There are many categories of drugs and levels of dealers and they cannot all be treated in the same way.
Finally each society has its own system of punishment for crimes. It is better to treat these people are give them an alternative rather than killing them as there are too many people who are suffering.

Has the internet brought us together or pushed us apart?

Everyone pretty much agrees on is the fact that the invention of the Internet has been a phenomenal achievement. Personally, I feel that the way someone decides to utilize the Internet affects whether it brings them closer to others or whether it alienates them even further.
Some people believe that the Internet has brought us together are through blogs such as social tools, Face book and through email services such as Gmail. These three programs allow us to talk to friends and complete strangers living halfway across the world in a matter of seconds. Because of these tools, we are now able to organize people for activities and events in a much faster and efficient manner. Being able to mail someone a picture, business contract or even simple letter takes a fraction of the time that regular snail mail takes to deliver.
Obviously, not everything that the Internet has provided is for our benefit. There is an insane amount of copyright violation taking place through illegal file sharing. People are able to rip TV shows, movies and games without paying for any of it and this hurts the entertainment industry. We also see people gaming over Xbox Live, Play station Network and PC at a far higher level than previously. Although this allows us to meet others over the internet, most of the time, it is just a way for people to spend time by themselves at home for countless hours at a time without any outside interactions. This is not that healthy but people can make a choice to use the internet for its beneficial means rather than completely hate it for the few inconveniences or hindrances that it brings along.
In conclusion, I agree, there are two sides to this question and the internet does have the ability to separate us. Social media like Face book and others help to bring people together. Using various websites and internet programs we can share pictures and videos, keep current in family events and happenings and share other information.

STUDYING FOR ADEGREE IN ADIFFERENT COUNTRY IS BETTER THAN STUDYING FOR A DEGREE IN YOUR OW N COUNTRY:

STUDYING FOR ADEGREE IN ADIFFERENT COUNTRY IS BETTER THAN STUDYING FOR A DEGREE IN YOUR OW N COUNTRY:

Education is something which is very important knowledge is essential in order to secure as good employment position as possible. Some people think studying for a degree in a different country is better than studying in your own country. This essay will look at the argument for and against studying in a different country.

I agree that studying in a different country is better than studying in your own country because of many important points. First of all, having more knowledge’s about different cultures. It is the best way to learn different languages by talking with native speakers and also learning about traditions that are different where they are. Second, became more organized and self-confident. It gives a lot of experiences to improve ability.

Some people are against studying in a different country. The first reason is that a living in a different place and culture lets the students to en counter many troubles such as different food, bad weather, no friends and they have no idea about the place and people. Also when they come back to their countries they need to get used to the culture again. It can become bid problems because they might not able to work with others.

In conclusion, I strongly believe that studying abroad is very beneficial because they come back very confident, able to take care of themselves and will be easy to solve some problems which come in their ways or try to stop them.

Should there be a compulsory age limit

When should people be made to retire? 55? 65? Should there be a compulsory age limit?

Many old people work well into their 60s and 70s, running families, countries or corporations. Other people, however, despite being fit and highly talented, are forced to retire in their or even earlier because of company or national regulations. This essay will examine whether people should be allowed to continue working for as long as they want or whether they should be encouraged to retire at a particular stage.
There are several arguments for allowing older people to continue working as long as they are able. First of all, older employees have an immense amount of knowledge and experience which can be lost to a business or organization if they are made to retire. A second point is that older employees are often extremely loyal employees and are more willing to implement company policies than younger less committed staff. However, a more important point is regarding the attitudes in society to old people. To force someone to resign or retire at 60 or 65 indicates that the society does not value the input of these people and that effectively their useful life is over.
Allowing older people to work indefinitely however is not always a good policy. Age alone is no guarantee of ability. Many younger employees have more experience or skills than older staff, which may have been stuck in one area or unit for most of their working lives. Having compulsory retirement allows new ideas in an organization. In addition, without age limits, however arbitrary, many people would continue to work purely because they did not have any other plans or roles. A third point of view is that older people should be rewarded by society for their life’s labor by being given generous pensions and the freedom to enjoy their leisure.
In conclusion, with many young people unemployed in low-level positions, there are often calls to compulsorily retire older workers. However, this can affect the older individual’s freedom - and right - to work and can deprive society of valuable experience and insights. I feel that giving workers more flexibility and choice over their retirement age will benefit society and the individual.

London underground station passengers

London underground station passengers

The graph illustrates the fluctuation in the number of people at London Underground Station from early morning at six o’clock to ten o’clock at night.

As an overall trend, the busiest time of the day is in the morning. There was a steep rise between six and eight o’clock, with 400 visitors using the station at eight Am. After that the number falls down quickly to less than 200 at 10:00 am. Between 11 am and 03:00 pm the number went up, with moderate increase just under 300 people using the station. In the afternoon the number goes down with less than 100 people using the station at 4pm. At 6 pm there is a rapid rise to a peak of 380. After 7 pm the number drops, with slight increase at 8pm, tailing off after 9 pm.

On the whole, the graph shows that London underground station is most crowded in the early morning and early evening periods.

Line Graphs: marriage age in USA

Line Graphs: marriage age in USA

The line graph illustrates the changes in the age of marriage in the USA over the last 100 years ago. It shows the changes in the average age of marriage are men were older than women all the years.

The graph stood and found gradual dips for both men and women in the first three years. In 1920 the female age was slightly decreased on 21 years while the male age was between 24 to 25 years. In 1940 girls start their new life on 21 which it is the same however, the men age has fallen down to 24 years. The women age was increased at 1970 but the men age was nearly the same age. In 1990 the age of the both sex was increasing very fast. Finally men reach to the age average 27 years. In 2000 while the women reached to 25 years and it was sharp increased for the both of them.

In summary, there was a gradual dip in the ages for both men and women in the first three years and an upward rise for both of them in the last three years. The age of men was always bigger than the female age.